Kilroy wrote:Robert, clarifying I am no T84 expert, by reading these posts and consulting manuals etc., my understanding of the different arrangements of the rear main drive gear bearing / oil sealing set up is the following.
Parts are listed front to back, starting from the snap ring installed on the shaft).
I put in bold in Arrangement c) what might answer your questions.
Arrangement a) (see for instance TM 10-1513, change 1, October 1942)
1) spacer (WO # A-738)
2) oil retaining washer (WO # A-410), a.k.a. "oil slinger"
3) main shaft bearing (WO # A-916), shielded side to the front
Arrangement b) (see for instance SNL G-503 January 1944, or figure 70 in TM 9-803 February 1944)
1) spacer (WO # A-738)
2) oil retaining washer (WO # A-410)
3) main shaft bearing (WO # A-916), shielded side to the back
4) oil retaining washer (WO # A-410)
Arrangement c) (as per Army Motor, December 1944, via Bob N’s site)
1) oil seal (WO # A-15428) w/ lip toward the front
2) spacer (WO # A-15427) w/ recessed end toward the front
3) main shaft bearing (WO # A-916), shielded side to the front
4) oil retaining washer (WO # A-410) w/ flat (closed) side to the front
This in itself seems clear, and it would seem three arrangements were used over time. However I am in doubt about some points.
The new parts (WO A-15428 and WO A-15427), according to the Army Motor article, were introduced on the assembly lines at the factories in November 1944 (judging from the referenced S/Ns). But,
Question 1: was the arrangement listed in the article, which refers to overhauling old transmissions in the field, also used at the factory?
Likewise, the Army Motors article refers to a previous TB 1803-1 (8 December 1943), which explained another procedure (presumably using old style parts) for stopping oil migration from TC to tranny. This procedure might be the same described, in April 1944, in Ch 2, Sect. II, para 9 a of TM 9-1803B, which in fact is one and the same as Arrangement b) above, thus also corresponding to an intermediate factory arrangement. But TM 9-1803B here is somewhat misleading because it mentions an “oil baffle” and states that “the oil baffle was not supplied on vehicles of early manufacture”. Now, if the new oil seal A-15428 was introduced in November 1944, this elusive “oil baffle” should actually be the standard oil retaining washer A-410, since no other part is listed in the SNL G-503 of that period, as far as I know. If that is so, I don’t know when MBs were ever produced without it, since TM-10-1186, which covers both MAs and early MBs, already lists the washer A-410. So,
Question 2: could it be that a third type of oil slinger/baffle/ washer/seal existed, and therefore a fourth type of arrangement, either factory or field, or is this just another instance of TM9-1803B being inaccurate?
Thanks Kilroy for taking the time to help wade through this......you too Bob.
I have taken another look at TM 9-803 and am again unsure if the manual is correct, or for that matter what is and what is not. On page 126 there is an exploded view of the T-84. It does not show part number WO-A-15428 however below that is a list of parts and WO-A-15428 (oil seal) is listed with a note: Only to be used with transmissions with a raised "H" on the case, same with WO-A-15427 (spacer). My tranny has the "H".
Then,,,,,,,,,the
exploded view in TM-9-803 does not agree with the
sectional view in that the exploded view does not show an oil slinger on the T/C side of the bearing as does the sectional view. In talking with George Baxter at AJP's, he said the oil "new" seal replaces the oil slinger so that the sequence from the snap ring back toward the T/C is the special washer (spacer) with the lip goes over the snap ring, then the seal is placed on the shaft with the flat side toward the T/C,....then the bearing. The spacer with the lip goes inside of the seal so that the two are mated so to speak. He did not quote any manuals, just his experience in rebuilding trannies.
John Barton and I exchanged a couple of e-mails and he is looking into it as well. Interesting stuff, these old vehicles. Maybe part of the problem is fitting new stuff to old stuff
Thanks for the look guys,
Bob