Handbrake handle differences?
-
- G-Command Sergeant Major
- Posts: 245
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 6:31 pm
- Location: Connecticut
Handbrake handle differences?
Are there early vs late construction differences for the end of the handle? The one my GPW has has a round hole and slot where the cable ( not original in my case) ball slides into. I ran across another handle recently that has no hole or slot, yet has remants of a cable inside, which I presume must have been placed before the handpiece was riveted on?
Is it possible these are military vs civilian differences?
Thanks
Is it possible these are military vs civilian differences?
Thanks
- Chris Fourroux
- G-Colonel
- Posts: 1218
- Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 8:34 am
- Location: Spirit Lake ID. USA
There is an early e-brake handle and a late.
And there is a civilian one too.
The early e-brake handle for use with the external emergency brake seems to have had the cable inserted in the ratchet tube prior to mounting the handle.
The later e-brake handle I can't give you any info on , but it was for the Internal emergency brake. I think it had a slot in the tip to connect the cable.
I'm pretty sure I have another civilian handle.
take a look at this picture.
The top one I thinkis for a CJ. it has a slot in the tip to connect a cable.
The middle one is an original early e-brake handle that some bonehead PO cut the cable on.
The last one is a reproduction early handle. Notice it is a little shorter and the rivet is not flush with the handle.
And here is a picture of the slot in the tip of the CJ handle.
hope that helps. maybe someone else has a picture of a later g503 handle.
Chris Fourroux
And there is a civilian one too.
The early e-brake handle for use with the external emergency brake seems to have had the cable inserted in the ratchet tube prior to mounting the handle.
The later e-brake handle I can't give you any info on , but it was for the Internal emergency brake. I think it had a slot in the tip to connect the cable.
I'm pretty sure I have another civilian handle.
take a look at this picture.
The top one I thinkis for a CJ. it has a slot in the tip to connect a cable.
The middle one is an original early e-brake handle that some bonehead PO cut the cable on.
The last one is a reproduction early handle. Notice it is a little shorter and the rivet is not flush with the handle.
And here is a picture of the slot in the tip of the CJ handle.
hope that helps. maybe someone else has a picture of a later g503 handle.
Chris Fourroux
-
- G-Command Sergeant Major
- Posts: 245
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 6:31 pm
- Location: Connecticut
- Carsten
- G-Colonel
- Posts: 1360
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2004 3:57 am
- Location: Denmark
- Contact:
Hi guys...
I think i might add something here:
I have the late style expanding e-brake, and found out i had the wrong cable, namely the one used for the early contracting type e-brake! When i tried to change the cable to a late style one, i also discovered that i had an early style handle with ratchet tube, and there was no way i could attach the late style cable to the early style ratchet tube!
The first picture shows the forward end of the ratchet tube, together with the early style cable in the middle (note that the small reinforcement on the end of the conduit is removed, to be able to slide the cable and conduit out through the tube), and the late style in the bottom. The second picture shows the entire ratchet tube seated in it's bracket, and the handle with one of the small rivets (one needed on each side of the handle). The ratchet tube alone is approx. 30,5 cm or 12 in. long, and it has no slot or anything for inserting the "stopper" located at the end of the cable! The cable might have been inserted through the tube before the conduit were pulled over it, because the small reinforcements in each end of the conduit can't fit through the ratchet tube! Another possibility is that those small reinforcements were fitted after the cable and conduit were inserted together through the tube...
I think i might add something here:
I have the late style expanding e-brake, and found out i had the wrong cable, namely the one used for the early contracting type e-brake! When i tried to change the cable to a late style one, i also discovered that i had an early style handle with ratchet tube, and there was no way i could attach the late style cable to the early style ratchet tube!
The first picture shows the forward end of the ratchet tube, together with the early style cable in the middle (note that the small reinforcement on the end of the conduit is removed, to be able to slide the cable and conduit out through the tube), and the late style in the bottom. The second picture shows the entire ratchet tube seated in it's bracket, and the handle with one of the small rivets (one needed on each side of the handle). The ratchet tube alone is approx. 30,5 cm or 12 in. long, and it has no slot or anything for inserting the "stopper" located at the end of the cable! The cable might have been inserted through the tube before the conduit were pulled over it, because the small reinforcements in each end of the conduit can't fit through the ratchet tube! Another possibility is that those small reinforcements were fitted after the cable and conduit were inserted together through the tube...
Last edited by Carsten on Tue Nov 29, 2005 12:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Carsten
Nyborg, Denmark
_________________
1945 Willys MB 409616 (ex-Austrian Army)
Nyborg, Denmark
_________________
1945 Willys MB 409616 (ex-Austrian Army)
- Hobo
- G-Lieutenant General
- Posts: 4929
- Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2003 8:55 am
- Location: Dithmarschen, "G" - ermany
- Carsten
- G-Colonel
- Posts: 1360
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2004 3:57 am
- Location: Denmark
- Contact:
- Carsten
- G-Colonel
- Posts: 1360
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2004 3:57 am
- Location: Denmark
- Contact:
- Chris Warne
- G-Colonel
- Posts: 1458
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 7:54 am
- Location: "B-26 Marauder Country" (Essex, UK)
- Contact:
- Luis
- G-Lieutenant Colonel
- Posts: 1003
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 11:15 am
- Location: Buenos Aires,Argentina
Re: Can Id these handle parking brake?
Hi fellows!
Can Id these brake handles?
Different lengths
Different numbers of teeth
Different distances between teeth
Thanks in advance!!
Regards
Can Id these brake handles?
Different lengths
Different numbers of teeth
Different distances between teeth
Thanks in advance!!
Regards
Mariano Paz
LU4ALM
1967 M606
1952 M100
MEP CE-016-AC Hol-Gar Mfg.
1945 Willys MB
Buenos Aires,ARGENTINA
LU4ALM
1967 M606
1952 M100
MEP CE-016-AC Hol-Gar Mfg.
1945 Willys MB
Buenos Aires,ARGENTINA
- lowbonnet
- G-Brigadier General
- Posts: 2173
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:56 pm
- Location: Holland
Re: Handbrake handle differences?
Interesting post from 2005.
I see that one of the e-brake handles didn't have a pin or rivet. My NOS handle don't have holes as well. Is having this pin something between late versus early?
I have a nice NOS f marked handle and I would like to replace the handle I currently have in my early 42 gpw.
The NOS one does not have any holes for the rivet. Should it have a hole for the pin???
If yes, who does sell such a rivet / pin?
Anyone has done this before? tips are welcome.
I don't have a special riveting tool.
Owner of example picture: Jeepdraw.
Apparently the rivet was already used on slat grills.. so my June 42 gpw most probably also uses a handle with a rivet.
I see that one of the e-brake handles didn't have a pin or rivet. My NOS handle don't have holes as well. Is having this pin something between late versus early?
I have a nice NOS f marked handle and I would like to replace the handle I currently have in my early 42 gpw.
The NOS one does not have any holes for the rivet. Should it have a hole for the pin???
If yes, who does sell such a rivet / pin?
Anyone has done this before? tips are welcome.
I don't have a special riveting tool.
Owner of example picture: Jeepdraw.
Apparently the rivet was already used on slat grills.. so my June 42 gpw most probably also uses a handle with a rivet.
June 1942 Ford GPW (script)
Transportation Equipment Co. T1, 1/4 ton trailer
Transportation Equipment Co. T1, 1/4 ton trailer
-
- G-First Lieutenant
- Posts: 661
- Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2002 4:59 am
- Location: Caledonia NY ...1 hour from Canada... '42 GPW, '42 M3 Halftrack, '52 M38A1, '53 M37, '51 M38
Re: Handbrake handle differences?
If I remember right, the civilian handle had the noched end so you could replace just the cable. I took my original F- marked handle, and used my Dremel motor tool to notch the end of the old GPW handle so it was like a civilian one, and then used a cable I took from a repo one that I bought from Ron, and used it on the old GPW F handle.
"Have fun with your jeep"
Jeep'in NY, About One Hour From Canada
42 GPW*42 M3 Halftrack*51 M38*52 M38A1*53M37
Vietnam Veterans of America unit 193
MVPA # 435
Member Niagara Military Vehicle Assoc; Ontario, Canada
Jeep'in NY, About One Hour From Canada
42 GPW*42 M3 Halftrack*51 M38*52 M38A1*53M37
Vietnam Veterans of America unit 193
MVPA # 435
Member Niagara Military Vehicle Assoc; Ontario, Canada
- Jon
- Australian Army (Retired) R.A.E.M.E.
- Posts: 11949
- Joined: Mon May 04, 1998 8:00 pm
- Location: Down Under In Queensland
- Contact:
Re: Handbrake handle differences?
lowbonnet wrote:Interesting post from 2005.
I see that one of the e-brake handles didn't have a pin or rivet. My NOS handle don't have holes as well. Is having this pin something between late versus early?
There's two drive pins holding the handle to the shaft. Not a rivet.
Jon Rogers
AUSTRALIA
http://jeepdraw.com JeepDraw Home Page & Drawings
Parts Colours Page http://jeepdraw.com/PART_COLOURS.htm
1944 GPW195611 20531384 ACM-2 17781
1942 MBT 19433W
AUSTRALIA
http://jeepdraw.com JeepDraw Home Page & Drawings
Parts Colours Page http://jeepdraw.com/PART_COLOURS.htm
1944 GPW195611 20531384 ACM-2 17781
1942 MBT 19433W
- lowbonnet
- G-Brigadier General
- Posts: 2173
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:56 pm
- Location: Holland
Re: Handbrake handle differences?
I didn't know the correct name, thanks Jon, now I know I have to use the name "drive pins".
But then, did all handles used in ww2 jeeps had drive pins to fix the handle to the handbrake stick? Or was there some moment in time that no drive pins were used? I asked this because one of the picture above has a green handle with no drive pins. Any my NOS green handle didn't have holes either? I am confused because I don't see the point not adding the holes in the factory, but instead they have to do that in the field (?)....
When doing a google search on "handle drive pins gpw mb" I came accross this post on g503.com viewtopic.php?f=4&t=63577
And that is in fact the main issue with how this forum is build. It lacks a place where information is stored which we all have agreed upon that it is correct. The problem with this forum is that there is no actual repository of all information collected about, for example, hand brake systems (the handle, brake drum etc.), or all information about windshields, hoods, chassis, engine etc. Information is shattered all over the place and questions (like mine) are asked dozens of times through the years this forum exists and they are lost in space because they can't be find. It would be better to collect this precious information, put a stamp on it and seal it in some kind of place (where it is possible to add more information gathered in the future). But at least I know where to look when I want to know everything about a particular item... now we are running in circles.
Jon, is this the type of drive pin you mean?
But then, did all handles used in ww2 jeeps had drive pins to fix the handle to the handbrake stick? Or was there some moment in time that no drive pins were used? I asked this because one of the picture above has a green handle with no drive pins. Any my NOS green handle didn't have holes either? I am confused because I don't see the point not adding the holes in the factory, but instead they have to do that in the field (?)....
When doing a google search on "handle drive pins gpw mb" I came accross this post on g503.com viewtopic.php?f=4&t=63577
And that is in fact the main issue with how this forum is build. It lacks a place where information is stored which we all have agreed upon that it is correct. The problem with this forum is that there is no actual repository of all information collected about, for example, hand brake systems (the handle, brake drum etc.), or all information about windshields, hoods, chassis, engine etc. Information is shattered all over the place and questions (like mine) are asked dozens of times through the years this forum exists and they are lost in space because they can't be find. It would be better to collect this precious information, put a stamp on it and seal it in some kind of place (where it is possible to add more information gathered in the future). But at least I know where to look when I want to know everything about a particular item... now we are running in circles.
Jon, is this the type of drive pin you mean?
June 1942 Ford GPW (script)
Transportation Equipment Co. T1, 1/4 ton trailer
Transportation Equipment Co. T1, 1/4 ton trailer